I'm working on a project using a QuickLogic FPGA and trying to minimize power consumption. I've already implemented clock gating and voltage scaling where possible. I'm particularly interested in techniques for optimizing the placement and routing to reduce dynamic power.
Does anyone have experience with specific strategies or tools that are particularly effective for power optimization on QuickLogic FPGAs? Are there any specific power estimation tools that are recommended for these devices? Any insights into minimizing leakage current would also be greatly appreciated. I'm using the QuickLogic IDE and would welcome suggestions for settings or configurations that can help with power reduction..
QuickLogic FPGA Power Consumption Optimization Techniques.
-
trotroutine
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2026 5:30 am
You’re on the right track with clock gating and voltage scaling.
For P&R, the main wins usually come from reducing long routes and high fanout signals so switching capacitance stays low.
For estimation, the QuickLogic Aurora power tools are the best baseline, especially if you can feed in realistic toggle rates (from sim/VCD).
Leakage is mostly device-level, so outside disabling unused blocks or using low-power modes, there’s not much more you can tune at design level.
For P&R, the main wins usually come from reducing long routes and high fanout signals so switching capacitance stays low.
For estimation, the QuickLogic Aurora power tools are the best baseline, especially if you can feed in realistic toggle rates (from sim/VCD).
Leakage is mostly device-level, so outside disabling unused blocks or using low-power modes, there’s not much more you can tune at design level.
-
midexternal
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2026 1:48 am
I’ve worked with QuickLogic devices a bit, and one thing that helped was focusing on placement to keep high-toggle logic clustered together so routing capacitance stays low. In the QuickLogic IDE, enabling any power-driven placement/routing options can make a noticeable difference. For estimation, QuickPower or the built-in power analysis tools are usually the go-to choices. Also, unused I/Os and floating signals can add leakage, so it’s worth reviewing those carefully. Reducing unnecessary switching activity in routing paths often gives better results than people expect.